Legal Opinion
Jocer Enterprises, Inc. v. Price
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 2010No. B218266PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.
In the underlying action, appellants Jocer Enterprises, Inc. (Jocer), Spencer Graffam, and Jodi Graffam sued respondents Ernest Price and Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley (Ropers) for legal malpractice and indemnity. The trial court sustained respondents’ demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend on the ground that appellants’ claims were time-barred under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Spencer and Jodi Graffam (Graffams) control Jocer, which employed Laura Attig as a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Vitatech Int'l, Inc. v. Sporn, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC v. Suns Legacy Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RenzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Genisman v. Carley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.