Legal Opinion

People v. Rhodes

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1934No. Docket No. 1774PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

On September 20, 1928, judgment was entered against the defendant convicting him of the crime of burglary. Prom that judgment no appeal was taken. Thereafter the defendant served notice that he would move the court for an order to annul, vacate and set aside the judgment of conviction. That motion was made and thereafter it was denied. Prom the order denying said motion the defendant has appealed and has brought up a typewritten transcript certified by the clerk of the trial court. However, he has not brought up a reporter’s transcript.

Thereafter the clerk prepared a supplemental transcript,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. ParaskevopolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. State v. PeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Arenstein v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. RanerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API