Legal Opinion

People v. Hall

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1930No. Docket No. 1567PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Appellants were charged by information with the crime of robbery. Each defendant pleaded guilty of the offense charged and they were sentenced to the state’s prison for the period prescribed by law. On the date set for the pronouncement of judgment, a hearing was had by the trial court under the provisions of section 1192 of the Penal Code, to determine whether the defendants were guilty of robbery in the first or second degree, as the charging language of the information did not allege facts sufficient to bring the offense definitely within the scope of the statute defining first degree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. Chew Lan OngCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. SeawrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. State v. LynchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API