Legal Opinion

Arenstein v. California State Board of Pharmacy

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1968No. Civ. 31292PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

State Board of Pharmacy filed an administrative accusation charging Arenstein and Ursem each with refilling a prescription for a dangerous drug without authorization of the prescriber (§4229, Bus. & Prof. Code), and that the corporation was subject to discipline because of their acts (§4357, Bus. & Prof. Code). 1 The board adopted the hearing officer’s proposed decision holding the three licensees to he subject to discipline and recommending suspension of the pharmacy permit of the corporation be suspended for 30 days (reduced to 5 days by the board) and the professional licenses of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. California Ass'n of Health Facilities v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Barber v. Long Beach Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. TuggleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API