People v. Walker
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from orders refusing to vacate the judgment, refusing to correct the minutes of the court, refusing to discharge the defendant, refusing to arrest the judgment, and vacating an order staying proceedings. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C.J.
—The defendant, having been convicted of the crime of embezzlement, appeals from the judgment of the superior court and from five separate orders made after judgment. The several notices of appeal were served more than a year after the rendition of the judgment, and the question arises, whether we have any jurisdiction of the appeal therefrom. In civil cases it seems to have been settled that this court is without jurisdiction to determine an appeal taken or attempted after the expiration of the time prescribed by the statute. (Fairchild v. Daten, 38 Cal. 286; Zangan v. Zangan, 89 Cal. 195.)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Langan v. LanganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Fairchild v. DatenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. FlohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. CarkeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.