Legal Opinion
At&t v. Wcab (Dinapoli)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 4, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
816 A.2d 355 (2003)
AT&T, Petitioner,
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DINAPOLI), Respondent.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted on Briefs November 8, 2002.
Decided February 4, 2003.
Charles S. Katz, Jr., Philadelphia, for petitioner.
Guy N. Paolino, Media, for respondent.
BEFORE: COLINS, President Judge, and SMITH-RIBNER, Judge, and FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.
OPINION BY Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
AT&T (Employer) petitions for review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting the Utilization Review…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Estate of LakatoshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Pallet v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Topps Chewing Gum v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Cosner v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bingnear v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005