Legal Opinion

Estate of Lakatosh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1995PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County denying Roger Jacob’s post-trial exceptions. We affirm.

This matter involves the finances of an elderly woman, Rose K. Lakatosh (Rose), and the scurrilous motives and actions of a man, Roger Jacobs (Roger), who sought to take advantage of the confidential relationship he developed with Rose so as to siphon money from her for his own benefit. On August 10, 1990, Donald F. Spry, II, Guardian of the Estate of Rose K. Lakatosh, deceased, filed a Petition for an Accounting and Imposition of a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. The United States of America v. Hart, OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. In Re Estate of ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. In Re Estate of ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In Re Estate of ZielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Estate of WhitleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Kanter v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API