Legal Opinion

Cosner v. United Penn Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1986No. 3142PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the lower court permanently enjoining appellant from failing to maintain the water and septic system that services appellees’ homes. Appellant contends that the lower court erred in permanently enjoining them from failing to maintain appellees’ water well and septic system because appellees did not meet their burden of proving all of the elements of equitable estoppel. We hold that the court below properly entered the injunction and, accordingly, affirm.

Appellees are or were owners of homes in Hillside Village, which was developed by David…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Blofsen v. CUTAIARSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Robinson v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Straup v. Times HeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Funds for Business Growth, Inc. v. MaraldoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. J.E. Mamiye & Sons, Inc. v. The Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine and General Assurance Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Estate of LakatoshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Boehm v. University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API