Commonwealth v. Wallace
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Saylor
For the reasons set forth by Mr. Justice Baer, I agree with him that the Commonwealth’s challenge to the Superior Court’s directive to the trial court to resentence Appellant in *251accordance with the terms of his original plea is waived by virtue of its failure to file a petition for allowance of appeal relative to such ruling. I would only add that there are mixed policy arguments to be made concerning whether a requirement to file a petition for allowance of appeal should be interposed as a prerequisite to issue preservation, which have not yet been addressed by this Court.1 Nevertheless,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SierraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FusselmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. GochenaurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.