Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether a claimant who has voluntarily retired from the work place is entitled to receive benefits for an occupational disease claim under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, 77 P.S. §§ 1— 1031. For the reasons that follow we find that a claimant who has voluntarily retired is not entitled to benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (hereinafter the “Act”).
This matter commenced on May 2, 1988 when the claimant filed an Employee’s Claim Petition for Compensation under the Act. At the time he filed the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Petrone v. Moffat Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Ciabattoni v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Waldameer Park, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.