Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DiNicola

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2005No. 15 WAP 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

866 A.2d 329 (2005)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant

v.

David Joseph DiNICOLA, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 9, 2003.

Decided January 19, 2005.

Paula C. DiGiacomo, for the Com. of PA, appellant.

J. Wesley Rowden, Meadville, for David Joseph DiNicola, appellee.

Before: CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and LAMB, JJ.

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

This appeal presents the question of whether Appellee's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination was violated by reference to his pre-arrest silence. This question is brought before our court by…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API