Legal Opinion

Rappleyea v. Campbell

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1994No. S035028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

8 Cal.4th 975 (1994)

884 P.2d 126

35 Cal. Rptr.2d 669

HAL RAPPLEYEA, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KEN CAMPBELL et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. S035028.

Supreme Court of California.

December 1, 1994.

COUNSEL

Mendes & Mount, Donald K. Fitzpatrick, Joan E. Havens and Michael S. Patterson for Defendants and Appellants.

Mark S. Simonian for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

The question is whether a default must be set aside and a default judgment reversed on the ground of abuse of discretion. We conclude that they must be, and reverse the Court of Appeal's judgment.

Defendants, Arizona…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grappo v. McMillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Grappo v. McMillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API