Shamblin v. Brattain
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PANELLI, J.
The sole issue is whether the Court of Appeal properly reversed the trial court’s order setting aside a default judgment. Because there is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
The facts are largely undisputed. William B. and Grace G. Shamblin (plaintiffs) sued Brattain Homes, Inc., and Edwin E. Brattain (hereafter Brattain) as well as three other codefendants (Robert L. Cohen and Paul M. Markley, officers of Brattain Homes, Inc., and Sunshine Homes, Inc. [Sunshine], hereafter codefendants) over a real property…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Hurtado v. Statewide Home Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by215 opinions
- In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Haraguchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.