Legal Opinion
Thurman Industries, Inc. v. Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1989No. 87-4399PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
This case presents multiple antitrust claims arising from defendant’s purchasing and marketing practices in its operation of “home center” stores in the Seattle, Washington area. Plaintiff appeals the dismissal by summary judgment of its claims for conspiracy in restraint of trade and actual monopolization under Sherman Act §§ 1 and 2, and the stipulated dismissal of its attempted monopolization claim under Sherman Act § 2 following the district court’s pre-trial order excluding certain evidence on the attempt claim. This appeal requires us to resolve two issues: whether…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Rutman Wine Company v. E. & J. Gallo WineryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Robert Alton Harris v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.