Legal Opinion

Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1997No. 94-16548PublishedCited by 686 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge DAVID R. THOMPSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge'WALLACE.

ORDER

An opinion in this case was filed November 5, 1996, and published at 99 F.3d 1504 (9th Cir.1996).

On November 19, 1996, the appellees filed a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. The panel voted unanimously to grant the petition for rehearing, withdraw the opinion filed November 5,1996, and issue a new opinion. Judge D. Thompson voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judges Wallace and G. Thompson so recommended. The full court was advised of the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by686 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Sergio Ramirez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Bancoklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

681 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API