Legal Opinion
William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1982No. 79-4207, 78-3604PublishedCited by 363 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. (Inglis) brought this private antitrust suit to recover treble damages against ITT Continental Baking Co. (Continental), American Bakeries Co. (American), and Campbell-Taggart, Inc., alleging violations of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a), and the California Unfair Practices Act, Cal.Bus. & Prof.Code §§ 17000-17101. Inglis also charged that Continental had conspired with its parent corporation, International Telephone &…
2Cases cited128 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by363 opinions
- Kareem Garrett v. Wexford HealthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
358 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.