Legal Opinion
Rutman Wine Company v. E. & J. Gallo Winery
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 30, 1987No. 86-1983PublishedCited by 247 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOTLER, District Judge:
Rutman Wine Company (“Rutman”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of Counts 1-4 of its Second Amended Complaint. These counts charge appellee E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”) and nonparty Wine Distributors, Inc. (“WDI”) with nonprice-related violations of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (1986), sections 2(d) and 2(e) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 13(d), (e) (1986), and Ohio’s Valentine Antitrust Act, Ohio Revised Code §§ 1331.01-.14. 1 Rut-man seeks not less than $7 million in damages and injunctive relief…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by247 opinions
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Reddy v. Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Richard M. Yuhasz v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.