Legal Opinion

Dunn v. City of Redmond

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1987No. LUBA 84-074; CA A40877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Dunn v. City of Redmond, 303 Or 201, 735 P2d 609 (1987). We described the factual background and the issues in our earlier opinion, 82 Or App 36, 38, 727 P2d 145 (1986):

“Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance in his appeal from two ordinances of the city of Redmond. The ordinances, enacted in 1985, designated petitioner’s property as open space park reserve and required that it be preserved for future use as a public park. Although residential use is not permitted outright by the ordinances, they allow the existing residential use…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joyce v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API