Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1985No. 84-1864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant claims that its purchases are excepted from Ohio sales and use taxes by R.C. 5739.01(E)(2) which excepts from the definition of “retail sales” and “sales at retail,” sales of tangible personal property used “* * * directly in the rendition of a public utility service * * * tf

R.C. 5739.01(Q)1 provides:

“ ‘Used directly in the rendition of a public utility service’ means that property which is to be incorporated into and will become a part of the consumer’s production, transmission, transportation, or distribution system and which retains its classification as tangible personal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Midwest Haulers, Inc. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. National Church Residences of Chillicothe v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Castle Aviation, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cincinnati Golf Management, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Manfredi Motor Transit Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Arga Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API