Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Kosydar
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHbRbbbt, J.
Under R. C. 5739.02, an excise tax is levied on all retail sales made in this state. Similarly, R. C. 5741.-02 imposes an excise tax upon the storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property within the state. The use tax, however, is not so levied: if the acquisition of such property, if made in Ohio, would be a sale not subject to the retail sales tax levied by R. C. 5739.01 to R. C. 5739.-31, inclusive. R. C. 5741.02(C)(2).
R. C. 5739.01 operates to except a number of transactions from the levy of the sales tax. R. C. 5739.01(E)(2) provides, in part:
“ (E) ‘Retail sale’ and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Ohio Edison Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- Newman v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- UAH-Hydro Kennebec, L.P. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.