Midwest Haulers, Inc. v. Glander
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
We must first determine the question whether the state of Ohio had the power to impose taxes on the sale and use of the items of tangible personal property in question. Most of the items involved in the assessment were trucks, trailers, tires and parts consumed in connection with their operation, and Midwest and Mutual did operate in interstate commerce.
That a state may not impose a tax which is a burden on interstate commerce is an established principle of law. The General Assembly recognized this in providing in Section 5546-2, General Code, that “the tax hereby levied does not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fyr-Fyter Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Community Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Castle Aviation, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Manfredi Motor Transit Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Freight, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.