Legal Opinion

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1982No. 81-495PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

R. C. 5741.02(A) imposes an excise tax on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property. CEI contends that its use of the leased gondola cars is exempt from use taxation pursuant to R. C. 5741.02, which states:

“(C) The [excise] tax does not apply to the storage, use, or consumption in this state of the following described tangible personal property,

a * * *

“(2) Tangible personal property, the acquisition of which, if made in Ohio, would be a sale not subject to the tax imposed by sections 5739.01 to 5739.31 of the Revised Code.”

Transactions which are exempt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lenart v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Abex Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. General Motors Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Gochneaur v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Satullo v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Newman v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Brown v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Moraine Heights Baptist Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Cousino Construction Co. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API