Legal Opinion

Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1990No. 89-1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 5739.01(E)(2) excepts from the sales tax (and R.C. 5741.02[C][2] correspondingly excepts from the use tax) purchases of items used “* * * directly in the rendition of a public utility service * *

In Manfredi Motor Transit Co. v. Limbach (1988), 35 Ohio St. 3d 73, 76, 518 N.E. 2d 936, 939, we set forth the conditions necessary to meet the public utility exception. First, the taxpayer must be a regulated public utility. Second, it must render a public utility service when the items are purchased. Third, it must use the items directly in rendering the public utility service.

In this case, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Manfredi Motor Transit Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Midwest Transfer Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. SFZ Transportation, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. CNG Development Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Castle Aviation, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. WallerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Rumpke Container Service, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API