Legal Opinion

Arga Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1988No. 86-1706PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The county permissive tax is levied pursuant to R.C. 5739.021, which provided at the time pertinent herein:

“For the purpose of providing additional general revenues for the county and paying the expenses of administering such a levy, any county may levy a tax * * * in addition to the tax imposed by section 5739.02 of the Revised Code upon every retail sale, except sales of motor vehicles, made in the county. * * *” (Emphasis added.)

For both the general sales tax imposed by R.C. 5739.02 and the county permissive sales tax, the situs of the “retail sale” is also the situs for the tax. Since…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. PPG Industries, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Standards Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Thomas Steel Strip Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. CNG Development Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Rotek, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Armco, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API