Kresock v. Gordon Ex Rel. County of Maricopa
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
THUMMA, Judge:
¶ 1 Accepting jurisdiction in this special action, this court grants relief because attorneys’ fees imposed as sanctions pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (AR.S.) section 12-349 (2016) 1 and Ariz. R. Civ. P. 11 are not “damages awarded” for purposes of calculating a supersedeas bond pursuant to AR.S. § 12-2108(A) and Ariz. R. Civ.App. P. 7(a)(4)(A).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 The superior court dismissed on motion Petitioner Frank D. Kresock Jr.’s civil claims against the Real Parties in Interest Rosemary DePaoli, Gregory J. and Jane Doe Meell, and Abram, Meell &…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. JantzenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- AOR Direct LLC v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Chula Vista Homeowners Ass'n v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Aor v. Hon bustamante/buteoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016