Legal Opinion

Kresock v. Gordon Ex Rel. County of Maricopa

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 17, 2016No. 1 CA-SA 16-0026PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THUMMA, Judge:

¶ 1 Accepting jurisdiction in this special action, this court grants relief because attorneys’ fees imposed as sanctions pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (AR.S.) section 12-349 (2016) 1 and Ariz. R. Civ. P. 11 are not “damages awarded” for purposes of calculating a supersedeas bond pursuant to AR.S. § 12-2108(A) and Ariz. R. Civ.App. P. 7(a)(4)(A).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The superior court dismissed on motion Petitioner Frank D. Kresock Jr.’s civil claims against the Real Parties in Interest Rosemary DePaoli, Gregory J. and Jane Doe Meell, and Abram, Meell &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. JantzenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. AOR Direct LLC v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Chula Vista Homeowners Ass'n v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. Aor v. Hon bustamante/buteoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API