Legal Opinion

Chula Vista Homeowners Ass'n v. Irwin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 27, 2018No. 2 CA-SA 2018-0031PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EPPICH, Judge:

¶ 1 The question presented in this special action is whether attorney fees awarded on claims for declaratory relief, violation of the open meeting laws, and slander of title under A.R.S. § 33-420(A), are damages for purposes of determining the amount of the supersedeas bond under A.R.S. § 12-2108 and Rule 7, Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. We accept jurisdiction because a party who wishes to challenge a trial court's order setting a supersedeas bond has "no equally plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal." City Ctr. Exec. Plaza, LLC v. Jantzen , 237 Ariz. 37, ¶ 2, 344 P.3d 339 (App.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Starr Pass Resort Devs., LLC v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API