Chula Vista Homeowners Ass'n v. Irwin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
EPPICH, Judge:
¶ 1 The question presented in this special action is whether attorney fees awarded on claims for declaratory relief, violation of the open meeting laws, and slander of title under A.R.S. § 33-420(A), are damages for purposes of determining the amount of the supersedeas bond under A.R.S. § 12-2108 and Rule 7, Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. We accept jurisdiction because a party who wishes to challenge a trial court's order setting a supersedeas bond has "no equally plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal." City Ctr. Exec. Plaza, LLC v. Jantzen , 237 Ariz. 37, ¶ 2, 344 P.3d 339 (App.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Starr Pass Resort Devs., LLC v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018