City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. Jantzen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWE, Judge:
¶ 1 City Center Executive Plaza, LLC; Information Solution, Inc.; and Jerry and Cindy Aldridge (collectively, “City Center”) seek special action relief from a trial court order that they must post a supersedeas bond of 25% of the full amount of the money judgments. City Center argues that Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 12-2108 and Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure (“ARCAP”) 71 limit the amount of the bond to the total amount of damages awarded, which it claims is $1.00.
¶ 2 Special action jurisdiction is appropriate here because City Center has “no equally…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Mahar v. Acuna, IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Outfront Media, LLC v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Kresock v. Gordon Ex Rel. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- AOR Direct LLC v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.