Legal Opinion

City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. Jantzen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 24, 2015No. 1 CA-SA 14-0254PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWE, Judge:

¶ 1 City Center Executive Plaza, LLC; Information Solution, Inc.; and Jerry and Cindy Aldridge (collectively, “City Center”) seek special action relief from a trial court order that they must post a supersedeas bond of 25% of the full amount of the money judgments. City Center argues that Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 12-2108 and Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure (“ARCAP”) 71 limit the amount of the bond to the total amount of damages awarded, which it claims is $1.00.

¶ 2 Special action jurisdiction is appropriate here because City Center has “no equally…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Mahar v. Acuna, IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Outfront Media, LLC v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Kresock v. Gordon Ex Rel. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. AOR Direct LLC v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API