Legal Opinion

Bonn v. Summers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1959No. 599PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

There is no contention on the part of the defendants that the plaintiff did not procure a bona fide purchaser, who was ready, able, and willing to purchase the property of the defendants upon the terms offered by them. However, the defendants take the position that under the terms of their contract, the plaintiff’s authority to sell the property involved expired at the end of three months from 21 May 1957 and that they were under no obligation to accept any contract of purchase submitted by the plaintiff after the expiration of that period. The contract is not so written. It provides for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Hunt.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Wilson v. FranklinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Lindsey v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Carver v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Crowell v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goodman v. KellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Renfro v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. W. W. Chambers, Inc. v. AudetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Ross v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Jaudon v. SwinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API