Legal Opinion

Renfro v. Meacham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1981No. 808SC522PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant. G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c) in pertinent part provides:

The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Upon a motion for summary judgment, the burden is on the moving party to establish the lack of a triable issue of fact. Kidd…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Peterson v. Winn-Dixie of Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Thompson-McLean, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Bonn v. SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. United States Development Corporation v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Piedmont Bank and Trust Co. v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Biggers v. EvangelistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Wright v. T & B Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API