Legal Opinion

Jaudon v. Swink

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1981No. 8030DC854PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Of course, it is familiar learning that on defendant’s motion for directed verdict, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, giving it all reasonable inferences beneficial to plaintiff and resolving all discrepancies in the evidence in plaintiffs favor. Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 180 S.E. 2d 297 (1971).

It is the general rule that in order to recover a real estate commission a realtor must show that he procured a purchaser, during the period of the listing agreement, who is ready, willing and able to purchase the property on terms…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Lindsey v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Martin v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Bolich-Hall Realty & Insurance v. DisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Property Shop, Inc. v. Mountain City Investment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Blondell v. AhmedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Fortress Re, Inc. v. Central National InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983
  5. Blondell v. AhmedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API