Legal Opinion

Carver v. Britt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1955No. 97PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

A mere contract between a broker and the owner of land to negotiate a sale of the latter’s land is not required to be in writing. White v. Pleasants, 225 N.C. 760, 36 S.E. 2d 227; Palmer v. Lowder, 167 N.C. 331, 83 S.E. 464; 8 Am. Jur., Brokers, Secs. 22 and 62; 12 C.J.S., Brokers, Sec. 62.

Plaintiff’s evidence tends to show that the defendant listed his land with him for sale at the price of $22,000.00, and that pursuant to his contract with the defendant he secured a purchaser ready, able and willing to buy at that price. That he telegraphed the defendant he had sold the property for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Trollinger v. . FleerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Richardson v. Greensboro Warehouse & Storage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Lindsey v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hutton v. HUTTON, ETC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Resort Realty of the Outer Banks, Inc. v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Burkhead v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Thompson-McLean, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Bryant-Durham Electric Co. v. Durham County Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API