Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Kelly

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1964No. 3176PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Plaintiff, Paul H. Goodman, a real estate broker doing business as the Good Realty Company, brought action to recover a commission claimed due under a listing authorizing him to sell certain real estate and equipment for defendant, Boyd Kelly. From an adverse judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, plaintiff appeals.

There is little dispute as to the facts pertinent to the appeal. At all times herein plaintiff was a licensed real estate broker in Wyoming with some twenty-two years’ experience in the business. Defendant was the owner of a ranch near Daniel, Wyoming, and under date of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McGinnis v. General Petroleum CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Leet v. JoderWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bosler v. CobleWyoming Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Starr v. HolckMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Mobil Coal Producing, Inc. v. ParksWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. Pennzoil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hursh Agency, Inc. v. Wigwam Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bulis v. WellsWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Busch Development, Inc. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API