Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Franklin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 2, 1924No. Appeal, 128PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
On April 27, 1923, G. C. Franklin, the defendant, being the owner of a public garage located at 606-618 South Sixty-Second Street, Philadelphia, gave the plaintiffs, Wilson & Son, real estate agents, written authority to procure a buyer for Ms garage at the price of $100,000. The writing says, inter alia: “I hereby agree to pay the above commission [3%] to Wilson and Son for procuring a buyer for my business or real estate, and when buyer is procured by Wilson and Son or by the undersigned and deposit is made they are to be paid a commission of 3% on sale price,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keys v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Whitcomb v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Bossart v. Erie Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Sowney v. BairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Gilbert v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Axilbund v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. WaltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Werner v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- H. I. Stahlman, Jr., General Partner, and Wife, Mrs. J. S. Stahlman, Limited Partner, D/B/A Stahlman Lumber Company, Ltd. v. National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Seligson v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.