Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Homeward Residential, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 2014No. D063740PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

Our Code of Civil Procedure provides a number of ways to serve process on a corporation doing business in the state. The most common method is by service on the corporation’s designated agent for service of process. (Code Civ. Proc., 1 § 416.10, subd. (a).) Otherwise, a corporation may be served by personally delivering a summons and complaint to those corporate officers, managers and employees identified in section 416.10, subdivision (b), or by delivering process to someone in charge of the office of one of the individuals identified in section 416.10, subdivision…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Al Binali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Conservatorship of Baylacq CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. County of Riverside v. Flores CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Craig v. Saddle Ranch Chop House CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API