Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtPerluss, P.J.
*1012On May 28, 2010 the trial court declared Randall Pittman a vexatious litigant and prohibited him, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 391.7, from filing in propria persona any new litigation in the courts of this state without first obtaining leave of the presiding judge or justice of the court where the litigation is proposed to be filed. Over the past seven years Pittman has made several attempts to have that order stricken, reconsidered, vacated or overturned. This appeal is from the trial court's most recent denial of Pittman's motion to vacate the order declaring him a vexatious…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ashton v. Clarke CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Astra Pacific Outdoor v. Sipperley CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Benner v. Tam (In re Benner), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Braugh v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Kremerman v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.