Legal Opinion

State v. Ashkins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 2014No. 10C42610; A150038PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for first-degree rape (Count 1), ORS 163.375,1 first-degree sodomy (Count 2), ORS 163.405,2 and second-degree unlawful penetration (Count 3), ORS 163.408.3 Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s admission of hearsay statements made by the victim, contending that the state’s notice of its intent to offer those statements did not meet the particularity requirements of OEC 803(18a)(b). We conclude that the state’s notice was sufficient under OEC 803 (18a) (b) and that, therefore, the trial court did not err in admitting the victim’s hearsay statements.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AshkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hagberg v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. TeaguesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. SlaviakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API