Legal Opinion

State v. Boots

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1989No. CC 10-86-07965; CA A44019; SC S36000PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

Defendant appealed his conviction of aggravated murder, asserting four assignments of error in the Court of Appeals. That court affirmed the conviction. State v. Boots, 94 Or App 713, 767 P2d 450 (1989). We allowed review limited to the propriety of the trial court’s instruction that the jury need not agree on the factual circumstance that made the homicide aggravated murder as distinct from simple murder. We hold that this instruction should not have been given.

An intentional homicide, or a homicide committed in connection with one of nine felonies listed in ORS 163.115(1), constitutes the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. CarothersWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. Flores RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2000

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API