State v. Slaviak
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, P. J.
*806Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, and one count of attempted first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427 and ORS 161.405. Defendant does not challenge the conviction for attempted sexual abuse and our opinion in this case does not disturb that conviction. Defendant does, however, challenge the two sexual-abuse convictions. He contends that the trial court plainly erred by not giving a jury concurrence instruction related to those two counts. For the reasons set out below, we agree that a concurrence instruction was plainly required…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. AshkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SparksOregon Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. TheriaultCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. RolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. CamphouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. Trenary-BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021