State v. Teagues
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.
In this criminal case, the state charged defendant with fourth-degree assault, among other crimes. At trial, the state contended that the jury could convict defendant of the assault based either on evidence that defendant had caused the alleged victim to scrape her knee or on evidence that he had choked her. In response, defendant asserted that, because the state was arguing that the jury could convict him of assault based on either of two separate instances of conduct, the trial court had to either require the state to elect its theory on the assault count or instruct the jury that it had to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. AshkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. OliphantOregon Supreme Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. TheriaultCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. RolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. SlaviakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. Trenary-BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.