Legal Opinion

Hagberg v. Coursey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 2015No. CV101331; A152066PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

In this post-conviction case, petitioner argues that he was deprived of adequate assistance of counsel in his underlying prosecution for rape, sodomy, unlawful sexual penetration, and sexual abuse. The post-conviction court denied the petition, concluding that petitioner had failed to show that his trial counsel was deficient. On appeal, petitioner raises three assignments of error in which he contends that his trial attorney should have objected to (1) the admission of hearsay evidence, (2) the prosecutor’s “vouching” for the victim’s credibility, and (3) the trial court’s imposition of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. LeahyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. HagbergOregon Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curry v. HighbergerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Barnett v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Antoine v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Ayala v. FhuereCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Curry v. HighbergerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API