Legal Opinion
Shell v. Schmidt
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1954No. Civ. 15541PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Twelve sets of plaintiffs, each set consisting of a husband and wife, brought these actions against Max Schmidt and others for fraud, and for breach of contract. The other named defendants were granted a nonsuit, the propriety of which is not involved on this appeal. The husband plaintiffs, all veterans, and their wives, had purchased homes from Schmidt, constructed by him in San Mateo County. The first 12 counts of the complaint, which are identical except for the names of the plaintiffs, all charge Schmidt with fraud as to each sale transaction. The 13th count, in which all plaintiffs join,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Adams v. AlbanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Garratt v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Woodhead Lumber Co. v. E. G. Niemann Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Gilbert Financial Corp v. Steelform Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Johnson v. Holmes Tuttle Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Martinez v. Socoma Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Tavaglione v. BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.