Legal Opinion
Planning & Zoning Commission v. Gilbert
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 23, 1988No. 13320PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Lebanon, appeals from a judg*698ment of the trial court denying the plaintiff a permanent injunction and other relief. We find error.
The underlying facts are not in dispute. The town of Lebanon adopted zoning regulations effective March 1, 1966.1 The regulations divided the town into six use districts: (1) rural agricultural residence district; (2) lake district; (3) business district; (4) planned business district; (5) light industry district; and (6) planned industrial park district. Section 3.2 of the regulations provided that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Doe v. Institute of Living, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Northeast Parking, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Coppola v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- D & J Quarry Products, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.