Legal Opinion

Selover v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1934No. 25284. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought this action upon two accident insurance policies, seeking to recover the principal sums thereof on account of the death of the insured. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict for defendant. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial having been denied, judgment was entered, from which plaintiff appeals.

Some years ago, the respondent insurance company issued to John W. Selover two policies of insurance, each in the principal sum of ten thousand dollars, insuring him against loss, resulting directly and independently of all other causes, from bodily…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Starr v. Aetna Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Standard Life & Accident Ins. v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. Anning v. Rothschild & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Nicholson v. NearyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hill v. Great Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Graham v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Angelus v. Government Personnel Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Wojcik v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API