Legal Opinion

Starr v. Aetna Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1905No. 5684PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tire superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered 'March 6, 1905, in favor of the defendant, dismissing, at the close of plaintiff’s testimony^ an action on a policy of accident insurance.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

The appellant is the beneficiary named in a certain accident insurance policy issued to her husband, Martin Luther Starr. This action was brought by appellant, as such beneficiary, to recover the principal sum of $5,000, by reason of the loss of the life of said Martin Luther Starr, as the proximate result of external, violent, and accidental means. Some of the facts were stipulated between appellant and respondent, and appear as follows: On December 6, 1903, the insured, Martin Luther Starr, was at Hatton, Adams county, Washington. At about four o’clock in the morning of said day, said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Buesching v. St. Louis Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Mallory v. . the Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Home Benefit Assn. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Parsons v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. Meadows v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. HarrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Brown v. HahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Walters v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API