Anning v. Rothschild & Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Respondents, as plaintiffs, recovered judgment in the trial court against appellant in the sum of $2,000, based on a verdict of a jury, for personal injuries sustained by respondent Pauline Anning in an automobile collision between the car in which she was riding and one belonging to the appellant.
*233After the evidence was in, and before the case was submitted to the jury, appellant moved for a directed verdict upon the ground that, according to all of the competent evidence in the case, the automobile which caused the injury, while belonging to it, was not then being operated in or about its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ludberg v. BarghoornWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Jones v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Beeman v. Puget Sound Traction Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. BrattonMontana Supreme Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Kay v. Occidental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- McMullen v. Warren Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.