Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
As a preliminary question to be considered, the defendant insists that the trial court erred in admitting opinion evidence of the physicians that the insured’s injury was caused by external and violent means, because this question was an ultimate one for the jury.
Many courts hold that, although a witness may be qualified to give an opinion on a subject which may be pertinent to the issue, nevertheless an opinion, whether expert or otherwise, may not be admitted when it touches the very issue before the jury. See 7 Wigmore on Evidence (3 Ed.), 18, Section 1921; Ohio & Indiana Torpedo Co. v.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- New York Life Insurance v. GamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Stinson v. EnglandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- McKay Machine Co. v. RodmanOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State Auto Mutual Ins. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- McQueen v. GoldeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.