Legal Opinion
Stocker v. Keith
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 9, 2002No. 16-98-02539; A108990PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Plaintiffs initiated this action for, among other things, violations of the Residential Landlord Tenant Act (RLTA), ORS 90.100 et seq., and the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.605 et seq. They prevailed on some of the claims, but the trial court declined to award them any attorney fees and awarded them only a portion of their costs. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning error to the trial court’s decision concerning attorney fees and costs. We conclude that the trial court erred and reverse and remand for reconsideration.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Plaintiffs were tenants of a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Executive Management Corporation v. JuckettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Gillespie v. KononenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Selective Services, Inc. v. AAA Liquidating & Auction Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roberts v. Interstate Distributor Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Cascade Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Allco Enterprises Inc. v. Goldstein Family Living TrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- LeBrun v. Cal-Am Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.