Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Haddock
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 1, 2003No. AC 23310PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
In this action arising out of a motor vehicle accident, the defendants, Hector L. Haddock and Subaru Leasing Corporation,1 appeal from the trial court’s judgment rendered following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Rita A. Wallace, in which the court ordered an additur of $15,000. The defendants claim that the court (1) abused its discretion by concluding that the juiy’s award of $1715 in noneconomic damages was insufficient as a matter of law and (2) improperly failed to offer the parties the alternative of a new trial if the additur was not accepted, in contravention…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Stern v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Mansfield v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Amba Realty Corp. v. KochissConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elliott v. LarsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Schettino v. LabarbaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Smith v. LefebreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Lee v. BallNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Snell v. BeamonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.