Lee v. Ball
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Maupin, J.:
In this appeal, we clarify that a district court’s grant of additur is only appropriate when presented to the defendant as an alternative to a new trial on damages.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The litigation below arose from a car accident in which the passenger in a vehicle, respondent Christopher Ball, sustained injuries after the driver, appellant Barry Lee, negligently turned into oncoming traffic. Ball sued Lee, alleging general and special damages. Unhappy with the results of court-annexed arbitration, Lee requested a trial de novo. Before trial, Lee served…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Evans v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Drummond v. Mid-West Growers Cooperative Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Bradley v. RomeoNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Gibellini v. KlindtNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- ITT Hartford Ins. Co. of the SE v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Albios v. Horizon Communities, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Kerala Properties, Inc. v. FamilianNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC v. OIC Marianas InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Schiff v. WinchellNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Hill Vs. Parker C/W 81138Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.