Legal Opinion
Amba Realty Corp. v. Kochiss
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 27, 2001No. AC 21317PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
The named defendant, Kyle J. Kochiss,1 appeals from the judgment of foreclosure rendered by the trial court. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) granted a motion for default against her, (2) rendered judgment of nonsuit in favor of the plaintiff2 on her counterclaim and (3) rendered a judgment of foreclosure by sale. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff commenced this foreclosure action in 1997. The defendant appeared pro se and filed an answer, special defenses and a counterclaim for actual damages, pain, suffering and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Rullo v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- City of Hartford v. Pan Pacific Development (Connecticut), Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bidoae v. Hartford Golf ClubConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- U. B. Vehicle Leasing, Inc. v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Wallace v. HaddockConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Amba Realty Corp. v. KochissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002